Quiz 5

  1. Which phylogenetically derived part of the skull (splanchnocranium etc.) comprises MOST of the mammalian skull?
  2. Dermatocranium

  3. The palatoquadrate bone and Meckel's cartilage are important bones for what reason?
  4. They comprise the upper and lower jaws of early vertebrates. These two bones are believed to have arisen from the first visceral (branchial) arches of the splanchnocranium

  5. Which class of vertebrates has an akinetic skull and why?
  6. Mammals-

    Adaptive reasons for akinesis: firmer substrate for chewing (only mammals extensively chew their food). The skull CAN'T move much because of the formation of the hard palate which is an adaptation for suckling and chewing. The hard palate allows both of these behaviors to occur while breathing.

  7. What structure allows turtles to engage in suction feeding?

Greatly enlarged pharynx which allows the water to be half swallowed and not allow the prey to escape.

5. Next to the letter, write what portion of the cranium each of the following sets of bones are derived within a mammal (i.e. splanchnocranium, dermatocranium, or chondrocranium)?

  1. surrounds the otic (auditory) and olfactory capsules
  2. chondrocranium

  3. tracheal cartilage and hyoid bone
  4. splanchnocranium

  5. Meckel's cartilage and palatoquadrate
  6. splanchnocranium

  7. Bones that make up the lateral and

anterior portion of the cranium (e.g.

parietal, frontal bones etc.)

dermatocranium

 

Appendicular skeleton-Chapter nine

The appendicular skeleton includes the limbs, and their associated pelvic and pectoral girdles.

As such the appendicular skeleton serves primarily, if not exclusively, a locomotor function.

There are large and obvious differences in the form of limbs used in aquatic versus terrestrial systems, but within each system, there are specialization of movement

Consider sea horses, flying fishes, moray eels, and walking catfish with respect to fin use as example.

Or how a horse, mole, gibbon, bat, and bird use their appendages.

Clearly the broadest distinction lies between fins and tetrapod limbs

We already discussed the functional significance of fins so we won't be dwell on that topic now. What we didn't discuss was what they are and where they came from-especially paired fins.

Paired fins are of particular evolutionary significance because it is these from which tetrapod limbs are derived.

Since fins are designed mostly to push water, they often have projecting spines and broad surfaces

Show Overhead of Fin structure text

Show image of generalized fin (Fig. 9.1 page 306 Kardong)

Show overhead of Archipterygial fin and Metapterygial fin

 

Fin Structure

Fin rays

Ostheichthyes

Lepidotrichia (scale hair)-ossified bone

or cartilage

Chondricthyes

Ceratotrichia-cornified rods

Pterygiophores (fin bearers)

Basals-near base of fin

Radials-between fin rays and basals

Two types of Fins

Archipterygial-basal fin runs down the midline of fin, flanked by radials on either side

Metapterygial-basal is proximal to the body and radials extend only on one side

These two fin types have influenced our understanding of where we think fins came from-

Where did fins come from? How did they evolve?

Show overhead of Gill-Arch Hypothesis

Show overhead of Fin-fold Hypothesis

Fin spine Hypothesis

Question: There is dermal bone in the pectoral girdle but not the pelvic.

Why is this?

  1. Dermal bone was necessary to reinforce the pectoral fins to a greater extent than pelvic fins and stabilize the fin

Dermal bones could attach to the pectoral girdle and allow for a more anterior orientation and leverage point of the pectoral fins.

Tetrapod limbs

Although the origin of paired fins lies buried in a murky and incomplete fossil record, the same does not hold true for the origin of tetrapod limbs.

Tetrapod limbs are derived from a Sarcoptergian ancestor, specifically, a Crossopterigian fish (like the Coelocanth) similar in limb form to the Coelocanth.

Fleshy lobed fins of these fishes have various bone elements that are easy to see the homology with early labrinthodonts

Show overhead page 168 Hildebrand

Show overhead page 280 Walker and Liem -pelvic girdle

Unfortunately, to avoid confusion-need to introduce new terminology associated with limbs-why? Because a hand isn't always a hand, and a foot isn't always a foot.

Show text overhead limb terms

 

 

 

Gill-Arch Hypothesis

Girdle came from gill arch

Archipterygial fins came from gill ray

Modern lungfish and gill arch shape of sharks suggest origin

Arguments against the Gill-Arch Hypothesis

  1. It does not explain the presence of the pelvic girdle
  2. It does not explain the presence of dermal bone in the pectoral girdle
  3. The pectoral girdle and gill arches have different embryological derivations

Fin Fold Hypothesis

Fins arose from continuous paired folds along vetrolateral portion of the animal

Folds served as stabilizers of caudal, dorsal, and ventral fins (e.g like metapleural folds on Amphioxus).

Pterygiophores stabilized the fins-proximate basals, Distal radials

Basals extended inward and fused with other bones producing girdle

Dermal fin rays are modified scales

Evidence-

Fossil fish show evidence of remnants of fin folds

Acanthodii have double rows of spines along ventrolateral border

Shark fins develop from continuous thickening along ventrolateral wall that later separate

Other vertebrate limbs form from a longitudinal zone of limb-forming opaque cells.

Embryologically, dermal fin rays do appear to arise from scale-generating tissue in modern fishes

Fin Spine Hypothesis

Fins originated as dermally-derived spines on ventrolateral portion of body

Anterior and Posterior pair became larger than others

Epidermis spread into sheets of webbing between spine and body

Fin rays developed to further stabilize and support membranes

Radial elements would support the large spine as a stabilizer at the base

 

Evidence for Fin Spine Hypothesis

Primitive acanthodii have two rows of ventrolateral spines

More advance acanthodii have larger pectoral and pelvic spines with webbing

 

Latest acanthodii show weakly developed fin rays.

 

Antiarchs, another extinct group of primitive gnathostomes, had jointed spony armored pectoral appendages (but no pelvic).

 

Evidence against:

 

Acanthodii bear many unique structures that do not suggest they were ancestors of modern fishes

 

Does not explain differences in dermal elements of pectoral versus pelvic girdle.

 

Appendicular skeleton

Pectoral and pelvic girdles - both mainly endochondral in origin

Pectoral girdle - evolved in fishes to provide rigidity for fins at head (where support interrupted by pharyngeal gill slits)

Initially only a bar (coracoid bar) and suprascapular cartilage.

Fishes - dermal bone, cleithrum, added to provide connection to head

- clavicle joined two sides of pectoral girdle ventrally

- scapulocoracoid reduced

Early amphibians - head breaks free for terrestrial feeding so cleithrum and other dermal bones reduced

Reptiles - only scapula, procoracoid, clavicle, and interclavicle remain

- clavicles fuse across midline to form furcula (wishbone in birds)

Mammals - scapula is usually all that is left (coracoid fuses with it)

- some have clavicle -> important for brachiation in primates

 

 

Pelvic girdle

3 endochondral elements:

pubis - anterior bone

ilium - reaches up to meet sacral vertebrae

ischium - posterior bone

At junction of 3 bones is acetabulum - socket that accepts femur

Fusion of all three bones in most mammals and birds to form innominate (or os coxa)