| SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY |
THE RHODOPHYTAE |
||||
| HOME | SYLLABUS | WEEKLY ASSIGNMENTS | J. SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY | TAXA OF LIFE | |
| PHYLUM RHODOPHYTA | |||||
INTRODUCTION TO THE RHODOPHYTA
Rhodophyta (ro-DA-fa-ta) is made of two Greek terms that mean rose (rodo - ρόδο); and plant (phyto -φυτό). The reference is to the red (rosy) color that dominates the pigments of many taxa.
The red algae are common seaweeds of warmer marine waters, and a few taxa occur in freshwater. Some are small and little more than individual cells, simple filaments, or very thin thalli (Figures A-G). Most are decidedly multicellular and made of large thalli (pseudoparenchymatous) or complex filaments (Figures H-V). They are large and multicellular (most species) with some of the most complex life cycles of any of the eukaryotes. Some go through a typical biphasic alternation of generation with may be isomorphic or heteromorphic. Most of the Florideophyceae, however, go through a triphasic life cycle which includes a haploid gametophyte, a diploid sporophyte (called a tetrasporophyte), and another diploid carposporophyte (see the life history of Polysiphonia and the description below).
The simpler taxa occupy two subphyla: Rhodellophytina and Metarhodophytina, each with a single class. Members of the Rhodophytina (Figures A-C) are simple unicells or pseudofilaments, cells held in a linear array by the common gelatinous covering (Figure B). They have no sexual reproduction. However, some taxa, like Porphryidium (Figure C) can produce large amoeboid forms whose particular function is unknown (Bold and Wynne 1978).
Members of the Metarhodophytina tend to be filamentous or pseudoparenchymatous. For example Composogon (Figure A) develops a pseudoparenchymatous thallus at the base from which branched uniseriate filaments emerge. They tend to have a biphasic life cycle (that is, alternation of sporophyte and gametophyte stages) in which the spermatia are simple and derived from vegetative cells.
The subphylum Eurhophytina is the most speciose of the three and contains two classes: Bangiophyceae and the Floridiophyceae. The defining synapomorphy is the occurrence of pit plugs in at least one of the phases of the life history. The pit plug, sometimes called a pit connection, is a lens-shaped mucilaginous structure in the walls of adjoining cells. The plug fills an aperture, which otherwise would allow the flow of cytoplasm from cell to cell.
Members of the Bangiophyceae have a simple alternation of heteromorphic generations in which the sporophyte is a small, prostrate filament called a conchocelis that releases meispores called conchospores. The sporophyte is the stage that has pit connections. The gametophyte can be variable in this group and range from filamentous (Figure E) to foliose (Figure F). Porphyra is the source of Nori, the black seaweed that wraps sushi; so, the discovery of the its history opened the door for its culture and the global availability of Nori. Specialized cells in the foliose gametophyte of Porphyra form the spermatia, and other large cells function as eggs. Following syngamy, the zygote settles down on a mollusk shell and develops into the sporophyte [See the life history of Porphyra].
The Floridiophyceae contains most of the taxa in the phylum. These plants tend to be complex, either filamentous or pseudoparenchymatous and tend to be seaweeds of warmer waters. The polysaccharides common in the cell walls of many in this group are the sources of agar, agarose, and carrageenin, common food additives. Chondrus crispus (Figure Q) is the red most commonly harvested on the coast of the eastern US as a source of agar.
Sexual reproduction is generally triphasic, such that isomorphic gametophyte and sporophyte generations are separated by the carposporophyte, a very different sporophyte that emerges from the development of the zygote. Following syngamy and karyogamy, the zygote nucleus typically moves to another cell, the auxiliary cell, from which the carposporophyte begins to develop. In general, the carposporophyte is a set of small filaments that terminate in diploid spores, carpospores. These disperse and germinate to form the sporophyte. This is generally pseudoparenchymatous and identical to the gametophyte. Certain cells develop as sporangia in which meiosis occurs. In the case of Polysiphonia (Figure O), the axial cells of the corticated filaments function as sporangia. Before this was recognized as a sexual cycle, the four meiospores that were produced in each sporangium were just referred to as tetraspores (4 spores), and this second sporophyte was called the tetrasporophyte. A gametophyte that is identical to the tetrasporophyte emerges from the tetraspore following its germination. The gametophytes have separate sexes, one produces spermatia in specialized spermatangia. The other produces eggs (called carpogonia), each with an elongate hair like extension called a trichogyne. When a spermatium encounters a trichogyne, it transfers the nucleus, which fuses with the egg nucleus and it travels to a auxillary cell to begin the cycle again. As the carposporophyte develops in Polysiphonia, a cup-like envelop, the cystocarp, develops around the carposporophyte [See the life history of Polysiphonia]. The life histories of the other red seaweeds (Figures K-V) are variations on the same theme. In some cases, they vary primarily in the location of the auxillary cell and the ploidy of the carposporophyte.
The ability of nuclei and other organelles to move through the thallus of the red algae has given rise to a number of parasitic taxa. These have specialized spores that fuse with cells of a target host plant. Then, they inject their nuclei, which direct the mitosis and proliferation of more parasitic nuclei. Then, they direct the development of spores and the formation of a sporangium.
The Rhodophyta seems to have a very long fossil history that might date back as far as 2,000 million years old (Gabrielson et al. 1990; Tappan 1976; Saunders and Hommersand 2004). Gabrielson et al. (1990) report that fossils from the Gunflint Chert (1,900 million years old) have been interpreted as a Porphyridium-like rhodophyte. They also report the occurrence of fossil multicellular eukaryotes that are interpreted as "bangiophyte" algae from the Paradise Creek Formation (1,600 million years old).
|
A. Rhodella, a unicellular genus. |
B. Stylonema with uniseriate pseudofilaments. |
C. Porphyridium, a unicellular genus. |
D. Uniseriate filaments of Compsopogon. |
E. Bangia, a branched filament |
|
F. Porphyra, a detail of the thallus which is the source of Nori. |
G. Hildenbrandtia encrusting rocks. |
H. Nemalion, a multiseriate filament. |
I. Audouinella, a branched filament with monospores at the ends of short branches. |
J. A herbarium sheet of Batrachospermum, a genus with a corticated central filament and highly branched lateral filaments. |
|
K. Corallina, a coralline red whose walls are impregnated with calcium carbonate; so the filaments appear armored and segmented. |
L. Palmaria, a herbarium sheet of a thalloid plant. |
M. Rhodymenia, a herbarium sheet of a thalloid plant. |
N. Asparagopsis, a highly branched genus. |
O. Polysiphonia showing its corticated filament and a carpogonium with an emerging trichogyne. Note the attached spermatium. |
|
P. Laurencia, a highly branched genus. |
Q. Chondrus, a dichotomously branched thalloid genus. |
R. Gracilaria, a highly branched genus. |
S. Cryptonemia, a genus with a branched thallus. |
T. Schizymenia, a thalloid genus. |
U. Plocamium, a highly branched genus. |
V. Champia, a genus with a highly branched thallus. |
Images taken from: A&C: http://microscope.mbl.edu/scripts/microscope.php?func=imgDetail&imageID=2680 and ID=674 B,L,M,N,T,V: http://www.ne.jp/asahi/marine/algae/ D: http://vis-pc.plantbio.ohiou.edu/algaeimage/pages/compsopogon.html E,F,J,O,P: Systematic Biology Biodiversity Collection G,Q: http://www.unige.ch/sciences/biologie/biani/msg/teaching/ H: http://www.unizh.ch/botinst/Roscoff2002/Algen/Nemalion.jpg I: http://vis-pc.plantbio.ohiou.edu/algaeimage/pages/Audouinella.html K: http://faculty.clintoncc.suny.edu/faculty/Michael.Gregory/ R,U: http://www.hawaii.edu/reefalgae/ S: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin/get_pr_image.pl?Cryptonemia+seminervis_R |
||
SYNOPTIC DESCRIPTION OF THE RHODOPHYTA
| The description of this phylum comes from Bold and Wynne (1985), Garbary and Gabrielson (1990), Gabrielson et al. (1990), Freshwater et al. (1994), Van den Hoek et al. (1995), Graham and Wilcox (2000), and Saunders and Hommersand (2004). |
|
I. SYNONYMS: Red algae, rhodophyta. II. NUMBER: >4,100 species (675 genera). III. PHYLUM CHARACTERISTICS: A. Structure and Physiology Cell Form: Unicellular, pseudofilamentous, filamentous, pseudoparenchymatous or parenchymatous. Flagella: Absent. Basal Bodies: Absent. Cell Covering: Covered by a cell wall consisting of microfibrils (xylan, mannan) and much gelatinous material including agar; some are calcified. Chloroplasts: Chloroplasts usually red with a distinctive ultrastructure in which the thyllakoids are separate, with chlorophyll a (sometimes d), B-carotene, xanthophylls, red and blue phycobilin pigments. Food Reserves: Floridean starch which forms in the cytoplasm. Mitochondria: Plate-like cristae. Nucleus: Usually uninucleate but nuclei can move from cell to cell in the filament or thallus. Centrioles: Not present. Inclusions and Ejectile Organelles: Not present. B. Mitosis, Meiosis and Life History Mitosis: Nuclear membrane breaks down at the poles only. Meiosis: Present. Sexual Reproduction and Life History: Haploid and diploid phases alternate in some species (biphasic life history), sometimes with 2 diploid phases (triphasic life history). Life Cycle of: C. Ecology: Mainly found in sea water, usually attached. |
In the past, the red algae suffered from the assumptions of what was primitive. Taylor (1976) placed the reds at the base of his phylogenetic tree of motile protists. They seemed to be primitive because they were nonmotile and had chloroplast characters that seemed very similar to those of the cyanobacteria (no stacked thyllakoids, chlorophyll a only, phycobillins in phycobillisomes). However, their complex structures and complex life histories indicate high levels of specialization rather than a primitive state.
Traditionally the red algae has been divided into two large groups: Bangiophyceae and Floridiophyceae (Sleigh et al. 1984; Dixon 1973; Bold and Wynne 1985; Van den Hoek et al. 1995; Graham and Wilcox 2000). This is the way that Margulis and Schwartz (1988, Pr-13; and 1998, Pr-25) treat the red algae. Garbary and Gabrielson (1990) question the need of dividing the red algae into two groups and prefer to lump all of the orders into a single class. In particular, Garbary and Gabrielson (1990) and Gabrielson et al. (1990) do not consider the "Bangiophyceae" to be a monophyletic group. Indeed, they suggest that since taxa within the Bangiales share features like pit plugs, cellulosic cell walls, peripheral plastid lamellae, band-shaped plastids, a cell vacuole and apical growth with the "Florideophyceae," the Order Bangiales belongs to the "Florideophyceae." Since this would place the genus Bangia in the "Florideophyceae," a nomenclatural conundrum would ensue; so, Garbary and Gabrielson (1990) find that the taxonomic problem is most easily solved by having a single class. Freshwater et al. (1994) who compare plastid DNA within the phylum show that the orders of the Florideophyceae form natural groupings. However, the other taxa appear to be paraphyletic.
I elect to follow the taxonomic system of Saunders and Hommersand (2004) who have attempted to rectify the past problems with rhodophyte classification systems by application of molecular phylogenetics. Their system separates the taxa of the "Cyanidiales" into a sister phylum (a concept promoted by Doweld 2001). The remaining phylum, that they call Rhodophyta, has three subphyla and four classes.
HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE RHODOPHYTA
| This system is from Saunders and Hommersand (2004) with some descriptions from Sleigh et al. (1984), Dixon (1973), Bold and Wynne (1985), Van den Hoek et al. (1995), and Graham and Wilcox (2000). |
|
SUBPHYLUM RHODELLOPHYTINA
CLASS RHODELLOPHYCEAE
SUBPHYLUM METARHODOPHYTINA
CLASS COMSPOPOGONOPHYCEAE
SUBPHYLUM EURHOPHYTINA
CLASS BANGIOPHYCEAE
CLASS FLORIDEOPHYCEAE
SUBCLASS HILDENBRANDIOPHYCIDAE
SUBCLASS NEMALIOPHYCIDAE
SUBCLASS AHNFELDTOPHYCIDAE
SUBCLASS RHODYMENIOPHYCIDAE
|
This page is maintained by Jack R. Holt & Carlos A. Iudica. Last revised: 03/10/2008 .